February 23, 2012

Iowa law would mimic anti-illegal immigrant law in Arizona

A bid to close-down Iowa businesses that employ illegal immigrants has cleared an initial hurdle at the statehouse. 

If the bill becomes law, an Iowa business caught with an illegal immigrant on its payroll would be placed on probation. If caught within the next three years of employing another illegal immigrant, the state would strip that business of its license to operate in Iowa. Representative Julian Garrett, a Republican from Indianola, says federal officials aren’t “vigorously” enforcing the rules and Iowa businesses competing against firms that hire cheaper illegal immigrant labor are paying the price.

“Now obviously that’s not fair,” Garrett says. “You shouldn’t be penalized for obeying the law.”

Representative Glen Massie, a Republican from Des Moines, says the issue has been ignored for years and illegal immigrants have become a burden on the state.

“The people I work with, they resent the fact there are a lot of tax dollars that are confiscated from their paychecks and given to people who may not be here legally,” Massie says. “That’s a little difficult to swallow.”

Massie and Garrett are part of a three-person subcommittee that gave its approval to the proposal late this fternoon. The third member of the panel, Representative Mary Wolfe — a Democrat from Clinton, is a co-sponsor of the bill, but after negative feedback she’s having reservations.

“I’m wondering why we couldn’t just make it Iowa law that folks have to use the E-Verify system and leave out all this stuff about enforcement,” Wolfe said.

She refused to sign-off on the bill. Several critics spoke out during today’s subcommittee meeting. Tom Chapman of the Iowa Catholic Conference said his group is opposed to the bill for both “philosophical and practical” reasons.

“If you’re interested in small government, this is a big government bill,” Chapman said. “It gets the government at the federal level with (an E-Verify) database involved in every hiring instance in the state of Iowa and I think we ought to think twice about that.”

Eric Tabor, the top deputy in the Iowa Attorney General’s office, argued the federal government should be the enforcer of immigration policy.

“What this bill does is it imposes a substantial burden on the attorney general’s office and on county attorneys and, presumably, on police to do these investigations,” Tabor said.

The bill asks Iowa officials to be investigators of complaints about the alleged hiring of illegal immigrants. Norwalk Police Chief Eddie Kuhl was the only person in the crowd who spoke in favor of the proposal. He said it can help crack down on identity theft.

“I think it’s a good thing, anything that we can do to deter that kind of criminal activity and would eliminate the victimization of our people,” Kuhl said.

This bill is fashioned after a law in Arizona which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled is constitutional. There is another, more controversial Arizona law which requires police — when they’re enforcing other laws — to question a person’s immigration status if the police suspect that person may be in the country illegally. That law is on hold, however, pending the outcome of court appeals.

Activists meet with Iowa’s attorney general about troubled mortgages (audio)

Mary Rabon of Kansas City speaks as Gina Gates of San Jose, California looks on.

Over 100 activists from around the country, most of whom have fallen behind on their home loans or lost their homes in foreclosure, met with Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller this morning. 

Miller is leading a 50-state group investigating complaints about the conduct of the nation’s mortgage industry. Fifty-two-year-old Gina Gates of San Jose, California lost her home through foreclosure in April of 2008.  She made the trip to Des Moines to attend the meeting with the Iowa’s attorney general.

“This is the first time — the first time — that people like me are being heard,” Gates said.

Gates spoke at a news conference, telling reporters she made about a quarter-of-a-million dollars worth of payments on her home, but after a slow-down in her business and some health problems, she couldn’t keep up with the adjustable rate mortgage. She and the other activists are asking the attorneys general to force the mortgage industry to modify loan terms so foreclosures can be avoided.  

“It makes no sense to us to foreclose on one family and then sell it to another family for half the price when they could have kept the first family there,” Gates said.

Sixty-two-year-old Mary Raybon of Kansas City, Missouri, told reporters her problems started shortly after her father died. “I ended up with his home and mine,” Raybon said. “My son was moving into my father’s home and just as we were about to put the home in my son’s name he lost his job, so I was trying to help him hold onto that one, helping him with a payment, put me one payment behind…and so it kind of just avalanched from there.”

Thirty-two-year-old Keya Alvarez became an activist on the issue when her 59-year-old mother began having problems with her mortgage holder after living in the home for 24 years. 

“We’re going to continue to hold the banks accountable, bring out stories to the street,” she said. “We are going to show up at bank’s door steps.  We are going to show up at C.E.O.’s door steps until this stops.”

The group met with Miller in the basement of a Des Moines church, then the activists held a news conference, cheering at the prospect of Miller pursuing criminal charges against what speakers at the news conference derided as “the big banks.”  The activists then loaded onto buses and staged protests at banks in the Des Moines area.  

“Are we ready to rumble?” Mike McCarthy of the National People’s Action group asked the crowd as he claimed the microphone at the end of today’s news conference. “I tell you, it may be cold out there but we’re fired up in here, aren’t we?” 

McCarthy described Iowa’s attorney general as “the fixer” and the mortgage industry as the “lions” who caused the financial meltdown.

Listen to the 21-minute-long news conference: capmortgage

Two A.G. candidates debate at U-of-I Law School

Attorney General Tom Miller, a Democrat, and his Republican challenger, Brenna Findley, debated this afternoon before students and faculty of the University of Iowa Law School.

Findley accused Miller of being an “activist” attorney general who was too quick to go after private businesses. ”The most important function is that the attorney general serve the interests of the people,” Findley said. “I believe I work for the taxpayers, not just for government.”

Miller suggested Findley would pursue a “right-wing” agenda if she’s elected. “The voters have a very, very clear choice,” Miller said. “I love this job…and I love it ’cause I have a passion for using the law to serve the interests of ordinary Iowans.” 

[Read more...]

Branstad, Miller debate state authority over DeCoster operations

Republican gubernatorial candidate Terry Branstad says the state’s attorney general, who is a Democrat, bears some responsibility for the massive egg recall which has created a “black eye” for Iowa’s poultry industry, while Attorney General Tom Miller says Branstad has his facts wrong.

Branstad blasted Miller during an appearance earlier today in Le Mars. “The present attorney general basically let Jack DeCoster off the hook. The whole state of Iowa is getting a black eye for that guy, habitual violator,” Branstad said of DeCoster. “We were on course to have him put out of business before I left office and then they cut a deal with him.”

Miller says his office “aggressively” prosecuted DeCoster, all the way to the Supreme Court. “Former Governor Branstad is totally mistaken about the law in Iowa concerning feedlots and habitual violators,” Miller said during a telephone interview with Radio Iowa. “It’s either a convenient memory, or a misrepresentation.”

[Read more...]