• Home
  • News
    • Politics & Government
    • Business & Economy
    • Crime / Courts
    • Health / Medicine
  • Sports
    • High School Sports
    • Radio Iowa Poll
  • Affiliates
    • Affiliate Support Page
  • Contact Us
    • Reporters

Radio Iowa

Iowa's Radio News Network

You are here: Home / Politics / Govt / Bid to give recorders an out on marriage licenses for same-sex couples

Bid to give recorders an out on marriage licenses for same-sex couples

April 14, 2009 By admin

A Republican in the Iowa Senate tried to give county recorders the authority to deny a marriage license to same-sex couples, but the proposal was sidelined this afternoon by a procedural motion.

An Iowa Supreme Court ruling paves the way for same-sex couples to apply for marriage licenses later this month. Senator Merlin Bartz, a Republican from Grafton, says the county recorders who issue those licenses are "in a quandary."

"…The reality is that because Iowa does not have a residency requirement for marriage licenses, on April 27 particularly in border counties or other counties with high populations of individuals that may be mobile and can commute in via airplane we may have — and it’s hard to predict — but we may have an influx of individuals wishing to receive same-sex marriage licenses in the state," Bartz says.

According to Bartz, one county recorder is "so furious" they may resign rather than issue a same-sex marriage license.

"In visiting with the County Recorders Association, they know that they’re right in the middle," Bartz says. "They’ve got a big bulls-eye pointed on them and like it or not, the supreme court has pushed the county recorders into an unenviable position."

Bartz proposed allowing those recorders — "as a matter of conscience" — to refuse to issue a same-sex couple a marriage license. Bartz asked his senate colleagues to grant the recorders a pass if they take that action, rather than face removal from office for failing to fulfill the duties of their office.

"I would suggest to you that the constitution that those county recorders swore an oath to and the constitution that I swore an oath to and the constitution that those seven supreme court justices swore an oath to must be different constitutions," Bartz said during senate debate.

Bartz argued it was a "matter of decency," but his proposal was ruled out of order. Senate President Jack Kibbie, a Democrat from Emmetsburg, said Bartz’ amendment did not fall within the scope of the identity theft bill the senate was debating.

AUDIO: Bartz remarks and Kibbie ruling..,MP3 7 min

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Filed Under: Politics / Govt Tagged With: Democratic Party, Legislature, Republican Party, Same-Sex Marriage

Featured Stories

Final employee who was there at the launch of the Iowa Lottery to retire

No more USPS mail in Iowa prisons; inmates to get copies of mail

State officials warn of influx of fake prescription drugs laced with fentanyl

‘Brain-eating amoeba’ discovered in Taylor County lake

Cedar Rapids therapist’s relationship with student leads to years in prison

TwitterFacebook
Tweets by RadioIowa

UNI’s Spencer Cuvelier bounces back from injury

Hutchinson calls Iowa State a perfect fit

Northern Iowa’s Farley touts new practice facility

First minor league game gets things started tonight at Field of Dreams site

Knoxville set to host sprint car racing’s biggest event

More Sports

eNews and Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Archives

Copyright © 2022 ยท Learfield News & Ag, LLC