• Home
  • News
    • Politics & Government
    • Business & Economy
    • Crime / Courts
    • Health / Medicine
  • Sports
    • High School Sports
    • Radio Iowa Poll
  • Affiliates
    • Affiliate Support Page
  • Contact Us
    • Reporters

Radio Iowa

Iowa's Radio News Network

You are here: Home / Crime / Courts / Branstad says it’s up to Iowans to decide fate of justices (audio)

Branstad says it’s up to Iowans to decide fate of justices (audio)

August 6, 2012 By O. Kay Henderson

Lt. Governor Kim Reynolds and Governor Terry Branstad.

Governor Branstad says he won’t tell Iowans how to vote in this fall’s judicial retention election.

The chairman of the Iowa Republican Party last week called on Iowans to vote “no” on Iowa Supreme Court Justice David Wiggins, but it won’t be just Wiggins whose name is on the November ballot.

The three new justices Branstad just appointed to the Iowa Supreme Court in 2011 will be on the judicial retention ballot as well.

“I have a lot of respect for Iowa voters and their ability to intelligently review and determine who should be retained and who shouldn’t,” Branstad says. “I would point out in the last election the district court judges were all retained. There were three supreme court judges that weren’t.”

The court’s chief justice and two other justices were tossed off the bench in the 2010 judicial retention election. Critics accused the court of “legislating from the bench” when it unanimously decided a case that paved the way for same-sex marriage in Iowa. That same criticism is being aimed at Justice Wiggins, who joined that unanimous ruling on same-sex marriage and whose name will be on the 2012 General Election ballot. Branstad says the chairman of the Iowa GOP has a right to express his opinion about Wiggins, but Branstad says as governor he’s staying out of it — and won’t be advocating for the justices he’s appointed to the court either.

“My position has always been, as it was in the 2010 election, that this retention of judges is a decision to be made by the voters and that I should not try to influence people’s decision,” Branstad says, “that they ought look at each individual justice, based on their record, and determine whether or not they as an individual voter think they should be retained.”

In April of last year Branstad predicted Wiggins would face a challenge in this year’s retention election because of the way Wiggins conducted himself as chairman of the group that selected nine nominees for the three openings on the court. Branstad said he heard complaints about Wiggins’ “lack of temperment” and other “grave concerns” about Wiggins’ role on the court.

Branstad was asked about this year’s retention election this morning near the end of his half-hour-long weekly news conference. Find the audio here.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Filed Under: Crime / Courts, News, Politics / Govt Tagged With: Republican Party, Same-Sex Marriage, Terry Branstad

Featured Stories

Congresswoman Axne favors Biden pandemic relief plan, Hinson not ruling out a ‘yes’

DOT plow crews struggling against blizzard conditions

Death penalty proposed for specific child murder cases

Iowa delegation breaks along party lines on Trump impeachment vote

Two northeast Iowa men admit to illegally harvesting ginseng

TwitterFacebook
Tweets by RadioIowa

UNI adds two nonconference games to basketball schedule

Iowa State-Kansas postponed

Iowa-Michigan State postponed

Fire damage to Riverfront Stadium electrical system will cost Waterloo thousands

Iowa State at Kansas State postponed

More Sports

eNews and Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Archives

Copyright © 2021 ยท Learfield News & Ag, LLC