• Home
  • News
    • Politics & Government
    • Business & Economy
    • Crime / Courts
    • Health / Medicine
  • Sports
    • High School Sports
    • Radio Iowa Poll
  • Affiliates
    • Affiliate Support Page
  • Contact Us
    • Reporters

Radio Iowa

Iowa's Radio News Network

You are here: Home / Crime / Courts / Supreme Court allows woman to sue Transportation Department in husband’s death

Supreme Court allows woman to sue Transportation Department in husband’s death

January 22, 2016 By Dar Danielson

Court-buildingThe Iowa Supreme Court has ruled a Warren County woman can sue the Department of Transportation for negligence in her husband’s death.

Deborah McFadden’s husband Charles died in a motorcycle accident in April of 2012 on Highway 69 in Warren County. Deborah filed a claim with the state appeal board alleging the DOT’s negligent maintenance of the highway caused his death. After six months of getting no answer from the appeal board, she filed suit in district court.

The district court, and Court of Appeals both threw out her case saying she had not exhausted her appeal through the administrative process before going to court. She appealed those rulings. State officials argued McFadden’s claim was not properly submitted to the appeals board because she had not clearly stated she was the administrator of her husband’s estate in the paperwork she submitted.

The Iowa Supreme Court says McFadden’s claim form answered all the questions required and contained all the information the state administrative rule requires. The court ruling says “the appeal board’s rules and claim form did not require McFadden to allege her representative capacity in presenting the tort claim in this case.” It says McFadden had been appointed administrator before presenting claim to the appeal board, and was entitled to present the claim and file suit in her own name as the estate’s legal representative.

The conclusion of the Supreme Court’s ruling quoted wording from a case more than a century ago:

“[R]ights must not be denied by too strict an application of mere legal formality. The sword of Justice is not often made more keen by the whetstone of technicality, and a right secured by too rigid means may harden into a wrong. . . . Not only must justice appear to be done, but it is the function and duty of this court and of all courts to see that it is done. Technicality should not become a Pegasus which, if ridden by an expert legal jockey, may carry us far from the true goal.”

The Supreme Court vacated the Appeals Court ruling and reversed the district court ruling and sent the case back to district court for action.

Here’s the full ruling: McFadden ruling PDF

 

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Filed Under: Crime / Courts, Fires/Accidents/Disasters, News

Featured Stories

Testing finds 21 new CWD cases in deer

It may become a crime in Iowa to use fake urine in workplace drug tests

February trending 18 degrees below average temperature

Iowa House Education Committee votes to end tenure at UI, ISU, UNI

Man convicted of two Muscatine County murders dies in prison

TwitterFacebook
Tweets by RadioIowa

Key stretch begins for #9 Iowa

Drake’s Roman Penn lost for the season

Drake’s DeVries named to Naismith watch list

State wrestling opens with limited attendance

Iowa’s Wieskamp is B1G Player of the Week

More Sports

eNews and Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Archives

Copyright © 2021 · Learfield News & Ag, LLC