• Home
  • News
    • Politics & Government
    • Business & Economy
    • Crime / Courts
    • Health / Medicine
  • Sports
    • High School Sports
    • Radio Iowa Poll
  • Affiliates
    • Affiliate Support Page
  • Contact Us
    • Reporters

Radio Iowa

Iowa's Radio News Network

You are here: Home / Politics / Govt / "Prevailing wage" concept debated at statehouse

"Prevailing wage" concept debated at statehouse

February 16, 2009 By admin

A bill that would require a "prevailing wage" for those who work on most taxpayer-funded construction projects in Iowa was debated tonight in the statehouse. A public hearing attracted about 50 speakers, including a number of union leaders.

"This proposal is not a new one," said Ken Sager, president of the Iowa Federation of Labor. "The federal government has required prevailing wage on cosntruction projects, as do five of the six states around us."

Jason Barton-Norris of Cedar Rapids, a member of the Carpenters Union, told legislators the state is currently engaged in a "race to the bottom."

"The current, lowest-bidder statute places the state in the position of actively driving down wages and benefits in our communities," he said. "By distorting the market, not only does this attract contractors that bid on the basi of who can pay the lowest wage, but forces state administrators to accept bids from out of town or out of state contractors."

But business groups and local governments oppose the bill. Andy Warren, state director of the National Federation of Independent Business, was among those who argued "prevailing wages" for city, county and school district construction projects will push property taxes higher, and push more businesses out of the state. "Regardless of the implied benefits," Warren said, "this bill will cause Iowa to lose more jobs."

Mike Webster is chairman of the Associated Builders and Contractors of Iowa, which represents about 5000 businesses. Webster also registered his complaint with the concept. "As an employer, I know first-hand how setting the wages of individual employees is a decision that is personalized based on their performance. It is not something that can be simplified and set by a government agency," Webster said. "I reward my reliable, hard-working employees with higher wages. This legislation interferes with an employer’s ability to make these decisions."

After the two-hour public hearing, a House committee was to begin debating the bill at 9:30 p.m.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Filed Under: Politics / Govt Tagged With: Democratic Party, Employment and Labor, Legislature, Republican Party

Featured Stories

Governor signs child care expansion into law

Iowa seniors have until July 1 to apply for new property tax break

Smoke from distant fires creates colorful sunrise in Iowa

DOT’s Motor Vehicle Enforcement Division to merge into State Patrol

Iowa’s governor approves liability limits for trucking industry

TwitterFacebook
Tweets by RadioIowa

Iowa AD Gary Barta announces retirement

Iowa to visit Creighton in Gavitt Tipoff Games

Iowa and Indiana collide Thursday at B1G baseball tournament

Former Hawkeye joins Lisa Bluder’s staff at Iowa

Iowa rolls in B1G Tournament opener

More Sports

Archives

Copyright © 2023 ยท Learfield News & Ag, LLC