• Home
  • News
    • Politics & Government
    • Business & Economy
    • Crime / Courts
    • Health / Medicine
  • Sports
    • High School Sports
    • Radio Iowa Poll
  • Affiliates
    • Affiliate Support Page
  • Contact Us
    • Reporters

Radio Iowa

Iowa's Radio News Network

You are here: Home / News / Supreme Court upholds Ames "Animal House" ordinance

Supreme Court upholds Ames "Animal House" ordinance

July 27, 2007 By admin

The Iowa Supreme Court has upheld an Ames city ordinance that seeks to keep some homes in the city from becoming full of college students. The Ames City Council passed an ordinance in 2000 that limits the number of unrelated people who can live in houses in certain residential areas to three. The city was trying to stop large numbers of Iowa State University students from getting together and moving into residential homes.

The Ames Rental Property Association, a group of people who owned some of the homes, sued the city after they and their tenants were cited under the ordinance for renting the homes to more than three people. The association said the ordinance violated the equal protection clause of both the Iowa and U.S. Constitution. The Story County district court ruled the ordinance was constitutional as it found the ordinance was related to a legitimate government interest.

The Iowa Supreme Court upheld the ruling saying the city is trying to provide quiet and peaceful neighborhoods, with low and stable population, limited congestion of motor vehicles. The High Court says it is a reasonable attempt to address concerns by citizens who fear living next door to the hubbub of an "Animal House," a reference to the 1978 movie about a house full of rowdy students — and therefore in the government’s interest in providing quiet neighborhoods for its citizens.

The court ruled 4-3 in favor of the city of Ames. Justice David Wiggins wrote the dissenting opinion, saying while the ordinance does not violate the U.S. Constitution, he believes it does violate Iowa’s constitution. Wiggins writes the ordinance is both overinclusive and underinclusive because it is irrational to suppose the type of relationship persons residing in a home have to each other has any rational bearing on the character or behavior of those persons.  

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Filed Under: News

Featured Stories

Governor hails passage of ‘transformational’ state government reorganization

Economic impact of Iowa casinos tops one billion dollars

State board approves millions in settlement with former Hawkeye football players

Monroe County man dies while serving prison term for killing brother

Bill would make changes in Iowa’s workplace drug testing law

TwitterFacebook
Tweets by RadioIowa

Traveling to Texas to watch the Hawkeyes in the Final Four will cost you

Iowa women are headed to the Final Four

Ogundele and Ulis are leaving the Iowa basketball program

Iowa plays Auburn in NCAA Tournament

Volunteers help pull off NAIA Women’s basketball championship in Sioux City

More Sports

Archives

Copyright © 2023 ยท Learfield News & Ag, LLC